Defence Security Asia
Informasi Pertahanan Anda

Dogfight for Dominance: Why the JF-17 Thunder Is Winning the Global Market Over India’s Tejas

Though both aircraft fall within the same lightweight multirole category, they embody divergent philosophies—the JF-17 as a budget-friendly, export-optimized workhorse supported by Chinese military diplomacy, and Tejas as a symbol of sovereign capability and long-term indigenous innovation.

6 83,399
(DEFENCE SECURITY ASIA) — In the high-stakes theatre of modern aerial warfare, South Asia’s two indigenous light fighters—the Pakistan-China co-developed JF-17 Thunder and India’s domestically built HAL Tejas—have emerged as strategic flagships representing distinct national doctrines, industrial trajectories, and geopolitical alignments.
The JF-17 Thunder, known in Chinese designation as the FC-1 Xiaolong, is the brainchild of strategic collaboration between Pakistan Aeronautical Complex (PAC) and China’s Chengdu Aircraft Corporation (CAC), conceived to replace Pakistan’s aging Mirage and F-7 fleets with a modern, cost-efficient multirole platform.
Designed from the outset for affordability, simplicity, and high sortie rates, the JF-17 has evolved into a potent 4.5-generation combat aircraft, with the latest Block III variant featuring AESA radar, advanced avionics, and access to China’s premier long-range air-to-air missiles.
Conversely, the HAL Tejas, a product of India’s long-gestating Light Combat Aircraft (LCA) program led by Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) and supported by DRDO, is the centerpiece of New Delhi’s aerospace self-reliance strategy under the “Make in India” framework.
A technological leap for India’s defence industry, Tejas is designed around agility, low radar cross-section, modular architecture, and future scalability—embodied most recently in its enhanced Mk1A variant equipped with Israeli AESA radar, improved EW systems, and expanded multirole capability.
Though both aircraft fall within the same lightweight multirole category, they embody divergent philosophies—the JF-17 as a budget-friendly, export-optimized workhorse supported by Chinese military diplomacy, and Tejas as a symbol of sovereign capability and long-term indigenous innovation.
JF-17
JF-17 “Thunder”

1. Origin and Strategic Philosophy

The JF-17’s development was driven by Pakistan’s urgent requirement to field an affordable yet modern combat aircraft capable of replacing legacy platforms under budgetary constraints, with China offering a collaborative solution that ensured rapid development, supply-chain resilience, and political support.
Tejas, meanwhile, was born out of India’s post-Kargil realization that aerospace dependence was strategically untenable, aiming to build a high-agility, multi-mission aircraft with minimal foreign reliance—a goal only partially achieved due to key subsystem imports.

2. Airframe and Design

The JF-17 features a conventional mid-mounted delta wing with an all-moving tailplane, incorporating limited composite materials for ease of manufacture and maintainability—sacrificing stealth for simplicity and speed of production.
In contrast, Tejas boasts a tailless delta-wing configuration and utilizes over 45% composite materials, significantly reducing its radar cross-section and structural weight while improving aerodynamic efficiency and survivability.

3. Propulsion Systems

Powered by the Russian RD-93MA turbofan, the JF-17 Block III delivers reliable thrust but suffers from a higher infrared signature and lower thrust-to-weight ratio compared to modern Western engines, although China is advancing the WS-13 as a future indigenous replacement.
Tejas Mk1A uses the U.S.-origin GE F404-GE-IN20, which offers cleaner operation, better reliability, and future scalability—especially with India’s planned transition to the GE F414 engine for the forthcoming Tejas Mk2.
Tejas
Tejas

4. Radar and Avionics

The JF-17 Block III is equipped with the Chinese KLJ-7A AESA radar, providing multi-target tracking capabilities, improved resistance to jamming, and compatibility with Chinese long-range missile systems.
Tejas Mk1A is outfitted with the Israeli EL/M-2052 AESA radar, regarded as more mature and capable in real-world performance, coupled with a digital fly-by-wire system, advanced mission computers, and electronic warfare suites co-developed with Israeli and Indian firms—providing a higher degree of situational awareness and digital warfare readiness.

5. Weapons Systems

A major differentiator is the JF-17’s integration of the PL-15 long-range BVR missile, with a reported range exceeding 200 km, giving it a decisive advantage in long-range engagements.
Tejas, while versatile and compatible with the Astra Mk1 (80–110 km) and future Astra Mk2, currently lacks a comparable BVR reach, though its multi-role capabilities are expanding with smart bombs, glide weapons, and upcoming deployment of the BrahMos-NG for precision strike.

6. Cockpit and Interface

The JF-17 offers a digital glass cockpit, HMD, and simplified Chinese avionics, focused on reducing pilot workload and optimizing combat effectiveness through intuitive displays.
Tejas provides a more sophisticated pilot interface with wide-angle HUD, better ergonomics, and fully digital flight control systems that enhance high-agility flight performance and pilot situational awareness.

7. Flight Performance and Agility

With top speeds near Mach 1.6, the JF-17 is adequate for interception and multirole missions, but lacks the high angle-of-attack agility required for modern air dominance roles.
Tejas, by contrast, is highly maneuverable, capable of extreme angles of attack, and optimized for close-in dogfights, aided by its static instability design and advanced flight control systems.
JF-17
JF-17 “Thunder”

8. Stealth and Survivability

The JF-17’s radar cross-section remains relatively high due to its metallic construction, although the Block III improves survivability with electronic countermeasures and signature management upgrades.
Tejas, built with stealth in mind, has a much lower RCS due to extensive composite use and smoother contours, and is backed by a more comprehensive EW and jamming suite, enhancing battlefield survivability.

9. Cost, Production, and Export Track Record

With a per-unit cost of US$25–32 million, the JF-17 is aggressively priced and already exported to Myanmar, Nigeria, with Iraq and Azerbaijan reportedly in advanced talks, aided by Chinese state financing, political backing, and rapid delivery assurances.
Tejas, priced between US$40–45 million, has attracted significant interest—Argentina, Egypt, and the Philippines among them—but is yet to close its first export deal, hampered by supply chain complexity, foreign component dependencies, and slower procurement cycles.

10. Strategic Relevance

The JF-17 has become the cornerstone of Pakistan’s airpower doctrine, offering high sortie rates, rapid replenishment, and modern BVR capabilities, crucial in the context of persistent tensions with India and limited financial bandwidth.
Tejas, though slower to field and export, is central to India’s long-term aerospace independence, and reflects its ambitions for interoperability with the West, indigenous force structuring, and high-tech military capability development.
Tejas
“Tejas”

Export Verdict: Thunder Roars Louder

Despite India’s aggressive defence diplomacy, it is the JF-17 Thunder that currently dominates the export market, with confirmed deliveries to multiple countries, competitive pricing, and full-spectrum Chinese support making it a highly attractive package for developing air forces.
By comparison, Tejas remains a strategic investment in India’s defence autonomy, but must overcome structural and geopolitical obstacles before it can emerge as a viable export competitor.
Factor
JF-17 Thunder
HAL Tejas
Confirmed Export Clients
✅ Myanmar, Nigeria
❌ None (as of 2025)
Cost Advantage
✅ Affordable
❌ Higher unit cost
Export Readiness
✅ Operational in 3 countries
❌ Still seeking first deal
Political Backing
✅ Strong Chinese support
⚠ Moderate Indian outreach
Supply Chain Complexity
✅ Simplified, all-Chinese
❌ Multinational dependency

Conclusion: Two Fighters, Two Futures

The JF-17 Thunder represents an effective solution for air forces seeking affordability, long-range missile punch, and a fully supported Chinese logistics chain—ideal for low-to-mid-tier clients in Asia, Africa, and the Middle East.
The HAL Tejas, while costlier and more complex, offers a path toward strategic independence, high-end capability, and Western interoperability, making it a long-term asset for India and potentially like-minded nations.
In the skies of South Asia and beyond, the battle between Thunder and Tejas continues—not just for air superiority, but for market share, influence, and future military partnerships.
— DEFENCE SECURITY ASIA

6 Comments
  1. Kenneth says

    JF-17 is not Thunder it’s a Blunder. The countries that have used JL-17 are regretting.
    The HAL Tejas and the JF-17 Thunder are both light combat aircraft with their own advantages and unique design philosophies. Here are some strengths of the Tejas compared to the JF-17:

    1. **Advanced Avionics**: The Tejas is equipped with modern avionics, including a digital fly-by-wire system, a multi-mode radar (like the EL/M-2032), and improved electronic warfare capabilities. This gives the Tejas better situational awareness, targeting, and overall combat effectiveness.

    2. **Higher Performance and Agility**: The Tejas generally offers better performance in terms of speed, agility, and maneuverability, partly due to its design and advanced engine technology. The thrust-to-weight ratio of the Tejas is often considered superior, enhancing its dogfighting capabilities.

    3. **Indigenous Development and Support**: The Tejas program benefits from India’s significant indigenous defense production capabilities, leading to a robust supply chain and maintenance support. This reduces reliance on foreign systems and allows for quicker upgrades and modifications.

    4. **Modularity and Upgrade Potential**: The Tejas is designed with modularity in mind, which means it can accommodate a range of weapons and systems. Future upgrades may be more easily integrated, allowing the aircraft to evolve with advancements in technology and combat requirements.

    5. **Stealthier Design Features**: The Tejas incorporates design elements aimed at reducing its radar cross-section compared to conventional aircraft, resulting in better survivability against ground-based and airborne radar systems, thereby enhancing its operational effectiveness in contested environments.

    6. **Operational Versatility**: The Tejas has been designed for multi-role capabilities, allowing it to perform air-to-air, air-to-ground, and reconnaissance missions effectively. Its versatility makes it suitable for a wide range of operational scenarios.

    These strengths contribute to the perceived advantages of the HAL Tejas when compared to the JF-17, particularly in a modern combat environment where advanced technology and multi-role capabilities are increasingly important..

  2. Capt Syed Aftab Hussain ShahPN(Retd) says

    A good comparison. Considering the continued R&D and technological
    upgradation pursuit in place JF17 has where given a quick, effective and cheap fix for PAF needs and some friendly countries is also destined to become a potent back bone for Pakistan’s Aerial Combat Capability; comparable to any western high tech fighter aircraft, in the times to come. So there is stark likely hood that this Pakistani Bird will surpass Indian Tejas in future as well.

  3. Muhammad Talal Baig says

    Totally one sided article
    Jf17 vs Tejas like
    Real Fighter vs Paper Tiger

  4. Amin says

    So far, JF 17 is winning in every capability on ground. By the time Tejas Mark 1 A and Mk 2 is operational, JF 17 FX will be in the air with clear lead in every field.

  5. Asad says

    The Tejas does not offer sovereign independance at all with its foreign engine, radar and electronic suite. Ejection seat…
    It is not a ‘made in India’ plane. Period…

  6. Gollum says

    Totally biased narrative for promoting Chinese Defense systems. There was no proof by Pakistani Media of drowning of Indian Fighter Jets. In fact the Chinese HQ9 Air Defense Systems were completely damaged by Indian Air Force. PL15 missiles were easily intercepted by Indias homegrown Akash Defense Air system. Chinese War Planes and Air Defense Systems are just copies of prestigious Fighter Planes and Air Defense Systems of US and Russia. Chinese Fighter Planes. Good for Beggar countries like Pakistan and Bangladesh.

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.