Comparative Analysis: Saab Gripen E/F vs. F-16 Block 70/72
Two of the most advanced 4.5-generation fighters competing for dominance in the global defence market
✈️ 1. Aircraft Overview
Feature |
Gripen E/F |
F-16 Block 70/72 |
---|---|---|
Manufacturer |
Saab AB (Sweden) |
Lockheed Martin (USA) |
Generation |
4.5+ |
4.5+ |
Roles |
Multirole fighter (air superiority, ground attack, ISR) |
Multirole fighter (air superiority, SEAD, precision strike) |
First Flight |
Gripen E: 2017 |
Block 70: 2015 |
Users |
Sweden, Brazil (E/F) |
Bahrain, Slovakia, Bulgaria, Taiwan, Jordan, others |
🧠 2. Avionics & Sensor Suite
Capability |
Gripen E/F |
F-16 Block 70 |
---|---|---|
Radar |
Raven ES-05 AESA (swashplate-mounted for wide field of view) |
AN/APG-83 SABR AESA |
IRST |
Skyward-G IRST (passive tracking of stealth aircraft) |
Not standard; optional via external pod |
EW Suite |
Fully integrated internal digital EW suite |
AN/ALQ-213 with optional external pods |
Sensor Fusion |
Advanced real-time sensor fusion from multiple sources |
Enhanced fusion, not as advanced as Gripen’s native system |
Cockpit |
Wide area display, touchscreen, customizable interface |
Upgraded glass cockpit, legacy architecture retained |
✅ Advantage: Gripen E/F in terms of sensor fusion, IRST capability, and native EW integration.

⚔️ 3. Weapons & Multirole Capability
Payload |
Both can carry up to ~5,300–7,700 kg of mixed ordnance |
---|---|
Air-to-Air |
Meteor (beyond-visual-range), IRIS-T, AIM-120 |
Air-to-Ground |
Taurus KEPD 350, RBS-15, JDAM, Paveway |
Cannon |
27mm Mauser BK-27 |
✅ Advantage: F-16 Block 70 has broader compatibility with US/NATO munitions, but Gripen E gains a qualitative edge with Meteor missile and long-range standoff strike (e.g. Taurus KEPD 350).
🚀 4. Performance & Flight Characteristics
Performance Metric |
Gripen E/F |
F-16 Block 70 |
---|---|---|
Max Speed |
Mach 2.0 |
Mach 2.0 |
Range (Ferry) |
~4,000 km |
~4,200 km |
Combat Radius |
~1,500+ km |
~1,500+ km |
Thrust |
22,000 lb (GE F414G) |
29,000 lb (GE F110 or PW229) |
Agility |
Canard-delta design; high angle-of-attack performance |
Excellent roll rate, proven agility |
✳️ Both aircraft offer excellent performance, but the Gripen’s canard-delta design offers superior energy management and short take-off capability, while the F-16 benefits from a higher thrust-to-weight ratio.
🔧 5. Logistics, Maintenance & Lifecycle Cost (in US$)
Metric |
Gripen E/F |
F-16 Block 70 |
---|---|---|
Operating Cost per Hour |
~$6,000–7,000 |
~$10,000–12,000 |
Maintenance Philosophy |
Designed for rapid turnarounds, minimal ground crew |
Mature global supply chain, but higher support costs |
Infrastructure Needs |
Can operate from highways, austere airstrips |
Requires traditional runways and support |
✅ Advantage: Gripen E/F is cheaper to operate, easier to maintain, and ideal for nations with smaller budgets or dispersed basing strategies.

🌍 6. Strategic & Geopolitical Considerations
Factor |
Gripen E/F |
F-16 Block 70 |
---|---|---|
Export Restrictions |
More flexible; less prone to political strings |
Subject to strict US foreign policy controls (ITAR) |
Industrial Offset |
Sweden offers tech transfers and local assembly options |
Limited ToT; some final assembly possible |
Interoperability |
NATO-compatible (Link-16) + custom datalinks |
Deep NATO integration; widely used across alliances |
✅ Advantage: Gripen E/F offers greater strategic autonomy, ideal for countries seeking to avoid overdependence on U.S. policy constraints.
📊 7. Summary Comparison Table
Feature |
Gripen E/F |
F-16 Block 70 |
---|---|---|
Sensor Fusion |
✅ Advanced |
✅ Good |
EW/IRST |
✅ Integrated |
⚠️ Limited |
Weapons Flexibility |
✅ Modern European + NATO |
✅ Extensive U.S./NATO |
Operational Cost |
✅ Lower |
⚠️ Higher |
Logistics Footprint |
✅ Light |
⚠️ Moderate |
Export Flexibility |
✅ High |
⚠️ Politically constrained |
Industrial Offset |
✅ Generous |
⚠️ Limited |
Global Support Base |
⚠️ Niche |
✅ Extensive |
🧠 Final Assessment
-
Gripen E/F is the better choice for countries prioritizing:
-
Sovereignty in defence policy
-
Lower lifecycle cost
-
Advanced networking and electronic warfare
-
Operations from dispersed or short runways
-
-
F-16 Block 70 excels for air forces seeking:
-
Deep NATO/US interoperability
-
Large-scale combat experience
-
Vast logistical and training infrastructure
-
Wider array of proven U.S. munitions
-