Defence Security Asia
Informasi Pertahanan Anda

Comparative Analysis: Saab Gripen E/F vs. F-16 Block 70/72

Two of the most advanced 4.5-generation fighters competing for dominance in the global defence market

0 1,260
✈️ 1. Aircraft Overview
Feature
Gripen E/F
F-16 Block 70/72
Manufacturer
Saab AB (Sweden)
Lockheed Martin (USA)
Generation
4.5+
4.5+
Roles
Multirole fighter (air superiority, ground attack, ISR)
Multirole fighter (air superiority, SEAD, precision strike)
First Flight
Gripen E: 2017
Block 70: 2015
Users
Sweden, Brazil (E/F)
Bahrain, Slovakia, Bulgaria, Taiwan, Jordan, others

🧠 2. Avionics & Sensor Suite
Capability
Gripen E/F
F-16 Block 70
Radar
Raven ES-05 AESA (swashplate-mounted for wide field of view)
AN/APG-83 SABR AESA
IRST
Skyward-G IRST (passive tracking of stealth aircraft)
Not standard; optional via external pod
EW Suite
Fully integrated internal digital EW suite
AN/ALQ-213 with optional external pods
Sensor Fusion
Advanced real-time sensor fusion from multiple sources
Enhanced fusion, not as advanced as Gripen’s native system
Cockpit
Wide area display, touchscreen, customizable interface
Upgraded glass cockpit, legacy architecture retained
Advantage: Gripen E/F in terms of sensor fusion, IRST capability, and native EW integration.
Saab Group
JAS39 Gripen-E Multi Role Combat Aircraft

⚔️ 3. Weapons & Multirole Capability
Payload
Both can carry up to ~5,300–7,700 kg of mixed ordnance
Air-to-Air
Meteor (beyond-visual-range), IRIS-T, AIM-120
Air-to-Ground
Taurus KEPD 350, RBS-15, JDAM, Paveway
Cannon
27mm Mauser BK-27
Advantage: F-16 Block 70 has broader compatibility with US/NATO munitions, but Gripen E gains a qualitative edge with Meteor missile and long-range standoff strike (e.g. Taurus KEPD 350).

🚀 4. Performance & Flight Characteristics
Performance Metric
Gripen E/F
F-16 Block 70
Max Speed
Mach 2.0
Mach 2.0
Range (Ferry)
~4,000 km
~4,200 km
Combat Radius
~1,500+ km
~1,500+ km
Thrust
22,000 lb (GE F414G)
29,000 lb (GE F110 or PW229)
Agility
Canard-delta design; high angle-of-attack performance
Excellent roll rate, proven agility
✳️ Both aircraft offer excellent performance, but the Gripen’s canard-delta design offers superior energy management and short take-off capability, while the F-16 benefits from a higher thrust-to-weight ratio.

🔧 5. Logistics, Maintenance & Lifecycle Cost (in US$)
Metric
Gripen E/F
F-16 Block 70
Operating Cost per Hour
~$6,000–7,000
~$10,000–12,000
Maintenance Philosophy
Designed for rapid turnarounds, minimal ground crew
Mature global supply chain, but higher support costs
Infrastructure Needs
Can operate from highways, austere airstrips
Requires traditional runways and support
Advantage: Gripen E/F is cheaper to operate, easier to maintain, and ideal for nations with smaller budgets or dispersed basing strategies.
F-16
F-16V Block 70/72 by Lockheed Martin

🌍 6. Strategic & Geopolitical Considerations
Factor
Gripen E/F
F-16 Block 70
Export Restrictions
More flexible; less prone to political strings
Subject to strict US foreign policy controls (ITAR)
Industrial Offset
Sweden offers tech transfers and local assembly options
Limited ToT; some final assembly possible
Interoperability
NATO-compatible (Link-16) + custom datalinks
Deep NATO integration; widely used across alliances
Advantage: Gripen E/F offers greater strategic autonomy, ideal for countries seeking to avoid overdependence on U.S. policy constraints.

📊 7. Summary Comparison Table
Feature
Gripen E/F
F-16 Block 70
Sensor Fusion
✅ Advanced
✅ Good
EW/IRST
✅ Integrated
⚠️ Limited
Weapons Flexibility
✅ Modern European + NATO
✅ Extensive U.S./NATO
Operational Cost
✅ Lower
⚠️ Higher
Logistics Footprint
✅ Light
⚠️ Moderate
Export Flexibility
✅ High
⚠️ Politically constrained
Industrial Offset
✅ Generous
⚠️ Limited
Global Support Base
⚠️ Niche
✅ Extensive

🧠 Final Assessment
  • Gripen E/F is the better choice for countries prioritizing:
    • Sovereignty in defence policy
    • Lower lifecycle cost
    • Advanced networking and electronic warfare
    • Operations from dispersed or short runways
  • F-16 Block 70 excels for air forces seeking:
    • Deep NATO/US interoperability
    • Large-scale combat experience
    • Vast logistical and training infrastructure
    • Wider array of proven U.S. munitions
— DEFENCE SECURITY ASIA

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.