(DEFENCE SECURITY ASIA) — Pakistan’s National Radio and Telecommunication Corporation (NRTC) has signed a three-year agreement with Türkiye’s Pasifik Teknoloji covering 100,000 Merküt first-person-view drones and local assembly or production, putting Pakistan’s capacity to replenish expendable aircraft at the centre of the deal.

The agreement, signed through Pasifik subsidiary TİTRA Technology and publicly disclosed on 19 September, also covers 500 Deli loitering munitions, 10 Alpin unmanned helicopters, 25 smaller Dumrul rotorcraft and 250 Korgan ground stations, bringing distinct logistics requirements into one procurement package.

The reported agreement follows a May 2026 framework that initially referred to a “friendly and allied country,” with Pakistan’s subsequent identification clarifying where the Turkish supplier intends to establish a local industrial foothold alongside its export business for unmanned aircraft.

The September signing followed field tests, end-user evaluations, simulation exercises and pilot training, a sequence that established a basis for procurement while leaving open how quickly an initial evaluation programme could expand into a system for training and sustaining multiple units.

The contract quantity measures the scale of the procurement, while the pace of deliveries, the size of serviceable stocks and the ability to replace expended aircraft will determine how much of that scale translates into a sustained change in force posture.

Merküt accounts for almost all the units in the package, a distribution that gives expendable aircraft a distinct place in Pakistan’s inventory alongside larger Turkish, Chinese and domestic unmanned systems with different demands for aircrew, servicing and ground support.

The inclusion of Korgan ground stations makes support equipment part of the purchase from the outset, raising questions about how units will finance power, network access and maintenance over the life of a fleet whose air vehicles are predominantly expendable.

The Alpin and Dumrul orders add two classes of reusable vertical-lift aircraft with different payload and support requirements, making fleet availability and maintainer training more revealing indicators of their eventual contribution than their small procurement totals suggest.

The agreement leaves the exact Deli variants unspecified, so the allocation of the 500 loitering munitions between the available configurations will determine the mix of ground equipment, personnel training and inventory procedures Pakistan must accommodate over three years.

The financial value and delivery schedule remain undisclosed, limiting any assessment of whether the programme’s main costs will lie in imported systems, setting up Pakistani assembly and test facilities, or sustaining a workforce and component supply during production.

The May 2025 India–Pakistan escalation provides the regional context for the deal, as both countries employed unmanned systems and subsequent procurement placed renewed attention on how quickly stocks and trained personnel can be replaced under pressure from counter-drone defences.

Türkiye gains a route into Pakistani serial production through an established state-owned electronics enterprise, while Islamabad gains another supplier relationship whose strategic value will depend on the component access, production rights and technical knowledge that Pakistan secures.

(READ) Pakistan Unveils KORKUT Drone-Killer as Türkiye Reshapes South Asia’s Air Defences

Merküt FPV Drones and Force Structure

Developed by SAVX Teknoloji, the Merküt is a small multirotor first-person-view aircraft whose place in the package reflects a requirement for expendable systems in much larger numbers than Pakistan typically associates with its reusable medium-altitude, long-endurance unmanned aircraft fleets.

Each expendable airframe leaves the inventory when used, making replacement capacity a recurring demand on procurement and quality assurance, while the reusable platforms in the same package place more of their lifetime burden on servicing, spares and airworthiness management.

The public Merküt baseline describes a compact aircraft with endurance that varies by payload, a characteristic that makes any assessment of fleet utility dependent on the configuration Pakistan receives and the operating conditions under which its units qualify it.

Publicly described Merküt configurations include radio-controlled and fibre-optic variants, creating different demands for operator instruction, component stocks and acceptance testing, while the agreement leaves the mix Pakistan will procure and potentially manufacture under licence open to confirmation.

Electro-optical and infrared equipment is available across publicly described configurations, and the sensor mix will influence acquisition and sustainment costs because interchangeable payloads still require compatible interfaces, documentation, maintenance tools and personnel trained to certify the equipment for service.

Pakistan’s existing Bayraktar TB2 and Akıncı aircraft give the armed forces experience with Turkish platforms, but familiarity with one supplier country provides limited evidence about common ground equipment or maintenance procedures across systems built for different classes of operation.

The Chinese Wing Loong and CH-series platforms and Pakistan’s Shahpar and Burraq families also shape the institutional setting for the new purchase, since the services must decide where FPV aircraft fit within existing responsibilities for procurement, instruction and airspace coordination.

A procurement of this size increases the consequences of manufacturing variability, because faults affecting a recurring component or a production batch could reduce usable inventory across multiple deliveries and force Pakistan to divert staff and equipment to reinspection and repair.

Simulation and pilot instruction during the evaluation phase provide an initial training base, while fleet growth will depend on whether training institutions can qualify enough operators, instructors and maintainers to keep pace with the arrival and acceptance of airframes.

For regional assessments of Pakistani military capacity, the decisive evidence will come from delivery and acceptance milestones, because an agreement covering 100,000 drones provides a measure of procurement intent before it provides any reliable measure of readiness across formations.

(READ) [VIDEO] Pakistan’s F-16s Could Soon Carry Türkiye’s Devastating GAZAP Thermobaric Bomb

Korgan Stations and Drone Logistics

The 250 Korgan units are ground support and observation stations, which makes the reported total of roughly 100,785 units a mixed procurement count covering both aircraft and infrastructure, an important distinction when comparing the deal with other unmanned systems acquisitions.

The final Korgan quantity is half the 500 associated with the earlier framework, showing that the September agreement changed the balance of ground equipment in the package while leaving the reason for the reduction and its implications for later purchases undisclosed.

Korgan’s publicly described automated storage and charging functions bring some routine servicing into the station itself, increasing the importance of dependable power, environmental protection and access to replacement parts wherever Pakistan eventually assigns the equipment within its force structure.

Remote operation and network connectivity add another category of sustainment expenditure, since the authorities responsible for the stations must budget for communications support and establish who maintains the links, credentials and software as different generations of equipment enter service.

Automated ground equipment can reduce some routine operator tasks while creating demand for technicians able to diagnose power, mechanical and software faults, shifting part of the personnel burden toward specialties that headline airframe totals rarely capture in regional force comparisons.

The published descriptions cover multiple Korgan configurations, leaving room for considerable variation in installation, transport and servicing requirements, so the contract quantity alone offers a limited basis for estimating how many personnel and vehicles the support system will require.

The ground stations and drones are associated with the same developer, a relationship that could ease equipment qualification if Pakistani production retains compatible interfaces and the contract gives local technicians the documentation needed to service changes across successive production batches.

Weather monitoring and related automation appear in public descriptions of Korgan, but sustained equipment availability still depends on the specific stations delivered and the standards used to evaluate their performance in the environments where Pakistan expects them to operate.

The three-year agreement creates a window for Pakistan to establish procedures for spare assemblies, charging equipment and technical support, with the relative timing of station and aircraft deliveries determining how much of the ground infrastructure is available during initial induction.

For other Turkish drone customers assessing local assembly, the pairing of Merküt with Korgan illustrates how supplier relationships can extend into long-term support infrastructure, where spare parts and software access may matter as much as the cost of an air vehicle.

Alpin, Dumrul and Deli Fleet Requirements

The 10 Alpin aircraft introduce a reusable unmanned helicopter designed around heavier payloads, giving Pakistan a platform to evaluate for cargo and surveillance roles where vertical lift is useful and where the availability of a small fleet will constrain regular tasking.

Public Alpin figures pair greater endurance with lighter loads, making payload and flight duration a trade-off that Pakistan will have to assess against its requirements before the helicopter’s advertised maximum performance can support meaningful comparisons with other unmanned aircraft.

A petrol-powered helicopter also brings a different support chain from electric small drones, since its recurring requirements include engine servicing and fuel supply, alongside the parts and trained personnel required to keep a rotorcraft fleet available over successive maintenance cycles.

The 25 electric Dumrul mini helicopters occupy a lighter class of vertical-lift aircraft, and their smaller size changes the balance between payload capacity and portability while shifting a greater share of routine support toward battery management, charging and electrical maintenance.

Dumrul’s advertised sensor options broaden the roles Pakistan could evaluate, but the mix of payloads included in the agreement remains unclear, leaving the eventual requirements for sensor maintenance, crew instruction and integration with existing surveillance systems uncertain.

The difference between 10 heavier and 25 lighter rotorcraft matters because a few aircraft undergoing maintenance or training can account for a sizeable share of either fleet, making availability rates central to assessing the operational significance of the acquisition.

The fixed-wing Deli family brings a different balance of endurance and ground support from the Merküt multirotor, giving Pakistan a second class of expendable aircraft whose training and acceptance requirements will vary with the eventual selection of the Deli variants.

Public descriptions distinguish a larger launcher-dependent Deli configuration from a lighter hand-launched version, a difference that affects the amount of ancillary equipment and transport needed, even though the September agreement groups all 500 aircraft under a single Deli family entry.

With only 500 Deli systems against 100,000 Merküt aircraft, the September figures indicate a clear preference for FPV volume, while the smaller fixed-wing tranche adds a separate inventory category whose future scale will depend on Pakistan’s experience with the initial procurement.

Taken together, the Alpin, Dumrul and Deli orders give the Turkish partnership a wider scope than the Merküt headline suggests, but each system will have to justify its own support infrastructure within a Pakistani fleet already drawing on multiple suppliers.

Local Assembly and Defence Ties

The agreement expressly covers local assembly or production through NRTC, and that wording leaves a consequential range of industrial outcomes between putting together imported kits and qualifying Pakistani suppliers for components that can be made, inspected and replaced domestically.

Haripur-based NRTC operates under Pakistan’s Ministry of Defence Production and brings experience in military communications, electronic warfare and secure information systems, giving it a relevant institutional base for integration work while leaving its eventual share of airframe manufacturing open.

The group structure splits the product portfolio between TİTRA and SAVX Teknoloji, so the practical scope of Pakistani production rights may vary by platform and by component even if all five product lines fall under the same three-year agreement.

Earlier discussion of technology transfer and possible joint ventures points to options for expanding the relationship, but the available agreement details leave unresolved whether the parties have committed to deeper localisation, shared engineering responsibilities or independent Pakistani access to critical components.

A local workforce and test line would put more of the manufacturing process under Pakistani control, while the ability to sustain output during an import interruption would still depend on which parts can be sourced domestically and how replacements are qualified.

The absence of a disclosed price or payment breakdown means there is no firm basis for comparing the procurement with competing drone packages or for separating the immediate cost of equipment from the longer-term cost of establishing Pakistani production capacity.

Pakistan and Türkiye already have experience with defence-industrial cooperation through programmes such as the Babur-class corvettes, giving the drone agreement a bilateral precedent while introducing a separate test of whether the relationship can support sustained production of expendable systems.

For Pasifik Teknoloji, the agreement ties export growth to a customer’s ability to absorb production work, making local quality assurance and repeat orders more revealing measures of industrial success than the initial quantity announced in the September disclosure.

Pakistan’s procurement from Turkish, Chinese and domestic suppliers spreads sourcing across multiple industrial relationships, while the longer-term value of diversification depends on whether the services can sustain different training, software and maintenance arrangements within the resources available to them.

The clearest milestones will be the first accepted deliveries, the start of Pakistani assembly or production, and disclosure of the work assigned to local suppliers, because together they will show how much industrial capacity the September agreement puts within Pakistan’s reach.

India–Pakistan Drone Competition

The May 2025 escalation, including India’s Operation Sindoor and Pakistan’s response, brought drones and loitering munitions into a confrontation between nuclear-armed neighbours, giving later procurement decisions a regional significance that extends beyond the immediate replacement of aircraft used or lost.

India claimed substantial interceptions of Pakistani drones, while Pakistan reported losses and damage to airbase infrastructure, leaving the public accounts without a common basis for measuring how individual systems performed or how those results shaped the September agreement’s specifications.

The contract adds evidence of Pakistan’s industrial priorities after the confrontation, but the timing alone cannot establish which lessons drove the acquisition, since broader efforts to diversify suppliers and build domestic unmanned aircraft production were already part of the procurement landscape.

The scale of the Merküt tranche gives regional observers a reason to watch how Pakistan funds replacement stocks, while its effect on the military balance will depend on actual delivery, service acceptance and the resources committed to keeping formations trained.

Counter-drone systems remain part of that balance because procurement quantities on one side provide only a partial picture of an evolving competition involving detection, electronic warfare and interception, where publicly reported outcomes can vary considerably across incidents and aircraft types.

India’s claims about interceptions are therefore relevant to regional spending decisions, but an assessment of defensive effectiveness requires reliable information about what was launched, which systems were engaged and how losses were counted, details the available accounts leave unresolved.

Pakistan’s ability to build and sustain small unmanned systems domestically would matter for force planning because replenishment would depend in part on industrial output within the country, although the extent of that shift remains contingent on localisation terms.

The strategic signalling runs in both directions, with the disclosed Pakistani procurement reaching a scale that invites scrutiny from India and Türkiye extending its role as a supplier whose relationship with Pakistan increasingly includes work intended to take place on Pakistani soil.

For Indo-Pacific observers, the agreement offers a measure of how a regional military is incorporating expendable unmanned aircraft into a fleet long associated with larger systems, alongside a case for examining the personnel and infrastructure costs that accompany headline quantities.

The significance of the Pakistan–Türkiye drone deal will become clearer as it moves through delivery and industrial milestones, when evidence of repeatable production and serviceable inventories can show how much the agreement has changed Pakistan’s enduring force posture.